Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brendan Evans vs Johan Brunstrom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Evans vs Brunstrom analysis and find out who is favored!
Brendan Evans vs Johan Brunstrom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Evans 2 - 0 Brunstrom
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Evans has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Brunstrom has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Evans, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brunstrom has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Evans has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brunstrom has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Evans has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Brunstrom winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Evans has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 128/ 138). Brunstrom has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 37/ 23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Evans winning 2 times and Brunstrom being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Evans winning 4 and Brunstrom winning 2. The last match between Evans and Brunstrom was at the USA F4, 20-02-2006, Quarterfinals, Hard with Brendan Evans getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Evans and Brunstrom have played a deciding set 2 times, with Evans winning 2 times and Brunstrom 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Evans winning 1, and Brunstrom 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Evans has played against opponents with an average rank of while Brunstrom has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Evans has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brunstrom has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Evans has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brunstrom has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
117
High
38
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
377
High
44
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
51% (224-211)
Career Total W/L
57% (128-98)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$81,765
Career Prize Money
$5,660
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Brendan Evans | Johan Brunstrom |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 33 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 6-2 | |||||
| 7-6(1) 6-7(0) 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brendan Evans | Johan Brunstrom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Brendan Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Devin Britton
Player
Brendan Evans
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brendan Evans
Player
Luka Gregorc
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Johan Brunstrom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Johan Brunstrom
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
36%
(
24 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johan Brunstrom
Player
Pedro Bernardi
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
10
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Viktor Troicki
Player
Johan Brunstrom
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
11
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
8
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
20%
(
14 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johan Brunstrom
Player
Zhicheng Zhu
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-4 5-7 3-6 13-11 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaan-Frederik Brunken
Player
Johan Brunstrom
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
10
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(7) 6-7(3) 0-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Thomas Schoorel
Player
Johan Brunstrom
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
11
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johan Brunstrom
Player
John El Khoury
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Joseph Sirianni
Player
Johan Brunstrom
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Evans Vs Brunstrom Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
